CoE EaP Facility Council of Europe Eastern Partnership Facility
Showing only one 'Expected Result'
|
01/03/2011 - 31/08/2013
|
JP Active
Coordinating DG:
Directorate of Political Advice
€ 4 000 000 |
|
Documents/Links:
|
| Intervention Logic |
Performance Indicators |
Sources of Verification |
Assumptions |
| Overall Objectives
To provide support to the reform processes in the EaP countries through a multilateral approach and to bring them closer to Council of Europe and EU standards in core areas covered by the Eastern Partnership Platform 1 “Democracy, good governance and stability”. |
|
|
|
|
Project Purpose 1 2011/DG I/JP/2632
Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries |
€ 923 995 |
|
To support and enhance the on-going process of reform of the judiciary with a view to increasing the independence, efficiency, transparency, accountability and accessibility of the judicial systems of the participating beneficiary countries, through intensive information exchange and best practice sharing. |
Gaps in legislation and practice are identified for each of the beneficiary countries;
Best practices and recommendations are formulated and presented to the authorities;
The obstacles to an effective reform of the judiciary are discussed and solutions are formulated.
|
CoE reports, including CEPEJ, Venice Commission;
Experts’ feedback and Secretariat mission reports;
IGO, Media, NGO reports;
Ministries of Justice reports.
|
Political stability in the beneficiary countries;
Wide policy support and commitment to legal reforms;
Availability of funds;
Availability of national and international experts.
|
|
Expected Result 1.2
Dissemination of the project’s recommendations and best practice among key national authorities and stakeholders at the national level with a view to adjusting national judicial reform policies in the identified areas of concern. |
The reports are translated, published and disseminated;
Policy round tables and conferences are held;
The follow-up to the recommendations is discussed and national authorities take them on board.
|
Translations, publications and records of distribution;
Experts’ feedback and Secretariat mission reports;
IGO, Media, NGO reports;
Ministries of Justice reports
|
Political stability in the beneficiary countries;
Wide policy support and commitment to legal reforms;
Availability of funds for activities and further reforms;
Availability of national and international experts;
Recommendations are effectively distributed.
|
